When I first heard about Xreal's One Pro smart glasses, I'll admit I was skeptical. After years of watching the AR glasses market stumble through chunky prototypes and underwhelming experiences, another "revolutionary" pair felt like more of the same hype. But Xreal's track record speaks volumes. The company has solidified its position as the global AR market leader, commanding a 47% share in 2024. What sets the One Pro apart from Meta isn't only the tech, it's the philosophy of what smart glasses should do.
Why the One Pro's display-first approach actually makes sense
What if smart glasses were simply a killer screen you could take anywhere? That is the bet. Instead of cramming in social tricks and an always-on assistant, Xreal focused on building the ultimate portable screen for productivity and entertainment. The dual 0.55-inch Sony Micro-OLED screens running at 1080p with a 120Hz refresh rate and a 57-degree field of view are not just spec-sheet candy. They deliver a virtual display up to 171 inches in size that actually feels immersive.
The leap is real. XREAL increased the FOV on the One Pro to 57 degrees, over 10 degrees more than the Air 2, made possible by a new flat-prism lens design that is over 40 percent smaller. It is not just about numbers. It is about a view that stops feeling boxed in, a problem that dogs most AR glasses.
One detail that surprised me, the One Pro can appear almost entirely black at the darkest level, which is great for movies. With three levels of electrochromic dimming for the lenses, you can use them in bright kitchens, dim hotel rooms, or a red-eye flight without feeling like you are wearing shades inside.
Think of it this way. While others chase the "everything problem," Xreal refined a display-first idea until it clicked. The 57-degree FOV means less edge clipping and fewer distractions, the kind that quietly break immersion. Editing a doc on a roomy virtual monitor, or watching Netflix on what feels like a private cinema screen, the One Pro sticks to its promise and delivers.
What Meta's social-first strategy misses
Don't get me wrong, Meta's Ray-Ban glasses have their place. The original Ray-Ban Meta glasses are the product that finally made smart eyewear mainstream by embedding technology into the iconic Wayfarer frames. But there's no augmented reality here. These glasses have two core functions: capturing first-person photos and videos, and acting as a pair of high-quality open-ear headphones.
That set of features suits social-first folks, and it is executed cleanly. Still, the ceiling is low. While the dual cameras capture surprisingly good content, perfect for social media, you are basically buying a face-mounted camera and speaker system. The fact that all this tech adds just 5g compared to a standard pair of Wayfarers is an engineering win, yet the use cases stay narrow.
The One Pro goes the other way. It positions itself as a tool for work and play. The virtual display can be used while working on laptops, watching movies, or videos away from home. Less about Instagram, more about a private workspace you can pull on like a hoodie.
Use both and the difference shows up in daily flow. Meta's glasses feel like an accessory to your phone, handy for hands-free capture but always sending you back to the screen in your pocket. Xreal's can stand in for your monitor, turning a train table or hotel desk into a setup with desktop-level screen real estate.
The technical advantages that matter in daily use
The One Pro's edge is not only the picture. The custom XREAL X1 chip enables native 3DoF spatial tracking with any device, without relying on additional software. That keeps latency drastically reduced, measuring around 3ms, which matters for real work and gaming.
Competitors often hover around 15 to 20 ms. You feel that lag. With the One Pro, fast cursor flicks, timeline scrubs, and game inputs land where you expect, quickly enough that the glasses disappear and the task takes over.
Audio gets similar care. The built-in Bose mini-speakers are located in the arms of the glasses, and they are supported by stereo speakers designed to fire down directly into your ear, the speakers are clear and crisp with good dynamics and noticeable low end. This is not a tinny afterthought, it is part of the appeal.
Modularity helps too. The optional XREAL Eye add-on is a compact, 12MP camera that adds six Degrees of Freedom (6DoF) spatial tracking and external recording capabilities, available for $99. Pay for what you use, skip what you do not.
Because of the X1, the glasses feel less like a passive mirror and more like an active display partner. Head tracking stabilizes, image placement stays locked in, and connected devices sip less power. It is a small shift that adds up when you are mobile.
The real-world usability question
Here is the honest part. The One Pro is not perfect. At 87 grams, it is heavier than Meta's options, and the device does not support wireless connectivity, requiring a USB-C cable for connection. The One Pro's price is $650, so yes, premium.
In use, setup is simple. Connecting the One Pro to devices like smartphones, tablets, or PCs is straightforward due to support for video over USB-C. The experience with various devices like iPhone 16 Pro, MacBook Pro, and Lenovo Legion Go was reported as excellent. The cable that seems annoying on paper turns into consistent performance with no wireless battery weirdness.
The weight fades once you settle into a session. The One Pro is not trying to be worn all day but is meant for specific purposes such as acting as a virtual monitor or personal theater. That focus helps, it avoids the trap of trying to be everything.
Across a few multi-hour work blocks, the adjustable nose pads and balanced arms kept the fit steady. No sliding, no hot spots. The electrochromic dimming was a quiet hero moving between bright meeting rooms and dimmer corners without fuss.
Where smart glasses are actually heading
The split between Xreal and Meta shows two visions for wearables. Meta frames glasses as social and AI accessories, a way to capture and share while staying in its ecosystem. Meta's glasses can connect wirelessly to a phone, whereas XReal's glasses need to be connected via a wire, and Meta's glasses have an AI assistant that allows users to automatically record video hands-free.
Xreal treats glasses as the next personal display. The Xreal One Pro's displays work across both of your eyes and can mimic a full-sized TV or monitor. It is about utility, productivity, and immersion.
Both tracks have value. I lean toward Xreal for the long haul. The best of AR and AI will come together into one device, but that is still a ways off. Until then, polishing high quality displays and spatial computing feels smarter than cramming in every possible trick.
You can see the audiences sorting themselves. Meta attracts creators and social diehards who want hands-free capture and AI flourishes. Xreal pulls in pros, gamers, and anyone who values screen space and picture fidelity over social tie-ins. Not really a fight, more like clean market lanes.
The One Pro reads as a grown up take on AR glasses, substance over sizzle, utility over novelty. While Meta chases social integration, Xreal is building the groundwork for portable personal computing when screens can live anywhere. That difference in philosophy changes the day to day, and it is why the One Pro hits where so many AR glasses fizzled.
Comments
Be the first, drop a comment!